From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Dec  5 03:08:31 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id DAA01172
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 03:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA01163
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 03:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA06863; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 03:08:18 -0800 (PST)
To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert),
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: news/lib - lib/news ??? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Dec 1996 22:34:31 PST."
             <199612050634.WAA02022@precipice.shockwave.com> 
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 03:08:18 -0800
Message-ID: <6859.849784098@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Err, I'm just the port maintainer.  I don't actually maintain all versions
> of inn... in case that's not clear (sorry about being ambiguious).

No, I understand this - I'm just supporting your argument that if
the original inn maintainer is going to put inn in /usr/foo/bar,
and refuses to budge, we should then put our inn in /usr/foo/bar to
avoid being incompatible with every other platform that inn supports.
POLA.

					Jordan