From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 16 21:02:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6090F913; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476D18D9; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEDD223F841; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:02:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 onyx.glenbarber.us CEDD223F841 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:02:03 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov Subject: Re: cgi/ports.cgi: Last database update Message-ID: <20130616210203.GU1692@glenbarber.us> References: <51930CFB.3020106@yandex.ru> <20130515125415.GA1635@glenbarber.us> <51BDEE9C.5020705@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kjzasy1UhXmRStS5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51BDEE9C.5020705@yandex.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: www@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:02:10 -0000 --kjzasy1UhXmRStS5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 08:58:04PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Hi Glen, >=20 > Glen Barber wrote on 15.05.2013 16:54: > >On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:20:11AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>some user on a forum pointed out that freebsd.org's ports tree is > >>not updated since 2012-11-11. F.e. I looking for gajim in the ports > >>tree: > >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=3Dgajim&stype=3Dall&sektion= =3Dall > >> > >>There is the message: > >>"Last database update: 2012-11-11 10:45:48 UTC" > >> > >>And gajim version is at 0.15.2 (while it was already updated to > >>0.15.3_1) and gajim-devel still here. > >> > >>If I understand correctly, this may be related to CVS-exporter deprecat= ion. > >> > >>Is this is a known issue and is there any plans to fix that? > >>Thanks. > >> > > > >I will take a look at this today. > > > >Glen >=20 > Any news? >=20 Sorry for the delay here. So, there are a few different problems all in this area, that are all related to the same underlying infrastructure. But, here's the short version: I am in the midst of deprecating the machine that used to be responsible for doing the doc/www builds (previously known as red.FreeBSD.org). Well, to be more clear, it is already (physically) deprecated, but its services have been moved to a jail on a different system. =20 The problem I've run into is that there are a few things that are so intertwined, and dependent on the filesystem, that it is actually quite much of a mess to untangle. I have some (I think most) of these running within the new system. (These are where some of the random error emails originated a few weeks ago, actually.) But there are still some service-untangling to do. Some of the filesystem-dependent things appear to use cvs-style checkouts of doc/www (meaning, different directories), and I think this is the core of the problem with the CGI stuff not working. Getting this working again is a very high priority for me, but unfortunately was out of town last week unexpectedly, so not a whole lot of untangling got accomplished. Once I get the CGI hosting moved from the current setup to the new setup, some (if not all) of these website CGI problems should go away as a general side effect of the updates. I hope, worst case, to have everything fully functional on the new system within the week. When this happens, I'll send a heads-up to ops-announce@ mailing list, since I found with the last move that some things did unexpectedly break, so while I can test the majority of the services provided here, I likely will miss something. I know it is not the answer you wanted to hear. But I am working on it, and just need a bit more time to make sure I do not break everything, since there are a lot of interdependencies here. Glen --kjzasy1UhXmRStS5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRvifLAAoJEFJPDDeguUaj4dkH/11sbk0ZIpqnCPZOCk99TAKH vj1fTmYe9MWOvnAhMI2AQ4bscjxkOeijJ0etYysaLNsJdysi1iJwiU0N+lYpvxop l9G0EE1GA14yl9G72yclJcdMlDBiHj8MpNFUDN5HqAROmXDsvfKhFEgpOyZxaMtK sRzvbXD7dk8UcYJkMKIXthMj87Jm7eMTrtLCCwk4pEb15k65WT86C1OJfjlQHmrx +ZPWEATmIIKw9D8Orb01zNv3jWfH9BsPsawVvgVHjc8neq3+fWm7ySmVnmtChYwr K5I91GVhXhuUtygD52NCchCsD2GE9krN4Iyc3mYkKmPs4vvnpCBQZ/Oh3nuzBus= =Y3YR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kjzasy1UhXmRStS5--