Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:25:06 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@riseup.net> Cc: "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The Graphics stack team has a blog now! Message-ID: <CAN6yY1umF46RRe=V_N1oeqdstYGqOyhZo6MQ57UyfJOCXLfKuw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5446DCD4.1090803@riseup.net> References: <5446DB1E.5080906@dumbbell.fr> <5446DCD4.1090803@riseup.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@riseup.net> wrote: > I believe putting 10.x as "Min. FreeBSD version" in the table is also a > mistake, because it should be one version (the lowest on which given > hardware works), just like with Intel GPU's, which have 9.1, not 9.x. So > I believe 10.x should be gone and only 9.3 should be left since 10.0 has > Radeon driver as well. > Since 10.0 predates 9.3 by quite a bit, I think it is appropriate that both be listed to avoid any confusion. This is not the case for 9.1. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1umF46RRe=V_N1oeqdstYGqOyhZo6MQ57UyfJOCXLfKuw>
