From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 14 13:26:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BA516A4CE for ; Sat, 14 May 2005 13:26:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B892343D6B for ; Sat, 14 May 2005 13:26:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28445 invoked from network); 14 May 2005 13:26:21 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 May 2005 13:26:21 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3D2E231; Sat, 14 May 2005 09:26:20 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "mail.schatti.ch" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 14 May 2005 09:26:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <443bsq7xc4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hints for small file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:26:22 -0000 "mail.schatti.ch" writes: > If you had to choose amongst the available filesystems on 5.4 to > contain just about 500kB to a MB, which would you use, and with what > parameters ? Which of these has the lowest administration overhead, > the lowest space overhead ? Generally I go with FAT for small media. If it's going to be a really active filesystem, then UFS will give better speed.