From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Apr  7  6:37:34 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1802137B400; Sun,  7 Apr 2002 06:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g37DbWC84143;
	Sun, 7 Apr 2002 06:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 06:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: <asmodai@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200204071337.g37DbWC84143@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, asmodai@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/32411: shutdown's absolute-time handling could be more useful
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: shutdown's absolute-time handling could be more useful

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: asmodai
State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 7 06:35:57 PDT 2002
State-Changed-Why: 
This change makes sense to me.  If I would do something like that with
absolute times I would mean the next occurence of that time.

How about committing it Garrett?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=32411

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message