From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jun 5 15:27:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f20.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668D237B401 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:27:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmd526@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:27:37 -0700 Received: from 66.89.179.250 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 22:27:37 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.89.179.250] From: "John Daniels" To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JDK ports revisited Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 18:27:37 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2001 22:27:37.0419 (UTC) FILETIME=[B96C01B0:01C0EE0E] Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is it better to group by jdk or platform? java/platform-src-jdkxx (current practice) vs. java/jdkxx-src-plaform where xx = jdk version src = source (ibm, sun, blackdown), blank if freebsd-originated plaform = linux (others in future?), blank if freebsd-native Example: jdk12 jdk12-blackdown-linux jdk12-sun-linux jdk13-sun jdk13-sun-linux jdk13-ibm-linux Everyone agrees that there is no need for a third digit in the version number? (jdk1x = latest version of 1.x) John _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message