From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 29 16:26:10 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1311F16A41F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:26:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110B243D8D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:26:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 5293530E0; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:26:04 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:26:04 -0600
To: Ian Lord <mailing-lists@msdi.ca>
Message-ID: <20051229162604.GA23233@soaustin.net>
References: <43B2F0A8.2030609@freebsd.org> <43B2F236.80903@rogers.com>
	<43B363FE.60906@obsecurity.org>
	<7.0.0.16.2.20051229084332.0403ca58@Msdi.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20051229084332.0403ca58@Msdi.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:26:10 -0000

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:45:34AM -0500, Ian Lord wrote:
> Then what's the point of ULE if it's slower then 4BSD?

It's still under development.  The intention is that it be faster.

mcl