Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 08:56:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Alin-Adrian Anton <aanton@spintech.ro> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which running thread gests the external signal Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0605030848260.6093@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <44589A77.7070707@spintech.ro> References: <4456A5B3.2010809@spintech.ro> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0605012044390.25456@sea.ntplx.net> <44579DE0.1050207@spintech.ro> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0605021400420.414@sea.ntplx.net> <44589A77.7070707@spintech.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: >> You are entirely confused. You should go back to the POSIX standard >> and get Dave Butenhof's Programming with POSIX Threads book. >> > [..] > > You are right. All is clear now, i re-read the link twice and played with > sigprocmask vs. pthread_sigmask. It's clear now, also with the help of: > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sigprocmask.html Note that sigprocmask() and pthread_sigprocmask() are equivalent. I don't even think pthread_sigprocmask() is in the standard any longer (it used to be in an older version of the standard). New applications should be using sigprocmask(). -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0605030848260.6093>