From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr 16 03:21:56 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA00977
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 03:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from iworks.InterWorks.org (deischen@iworks.interworks.org [128.255.18.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA00971
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 03:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org)
Received: (from deischen@localhost) by iworks.InterWorks.org (8.8.7/) id FAA28103; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 05:30:49 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199804161030.FAA28103@iworks.InterWorks.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 05:30:49 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@cimlogic.com.au
Subject: Re: Status of native threads on CURRENT / Support for mySQL
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> The code in libc_r passes all my local tests that include some rather
> big applications with performance comparisons of the same code running
> under OSF/1, including some X based. There have been changes
> recently to allow for kernel threading as an alternative, but these
> are insignificant.

Care to elaborate on this?  Can we now create kernel threads with
PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM and get kernel threads?

Dan Eischen
deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message