From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 06:02:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C1A16A4CE; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 06:02:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1740F43D2F; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 06:02:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509B512AFC1; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 02:02:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90313-06; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 06:02:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C0812AF38; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 02:02:01 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8EDBA350F0; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 02:02:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79135350EB; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 02:02:01 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 02:02:01 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Don Lewis In-Reply-To: <200411070557.iA75ux5W050510@gw.catspoiler.org> Message-ID: <20041107020120.X46679@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200411070557.iA75ux5W050510@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Don's changes to fsck on 4.x ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 06:02:04 -0000 On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Don Lewis wrote: > Yes. The behaviour should be exactly the same as before. The only > difference is that phase 4 should run a lot faster if there are a lot of > UNREF files and directories. 'k, everything seemed to run faster except the first two, but the uptime was only 5 days on taht server also, so not alot of time to build up the 'stale files' ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664