Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:01:20 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@oltrelinux.com> To: Patrick Tracanelli <eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: In-Kernel NAT Message-ID: <20060404150120.GA3159@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <44328659.8010102@freebsdbrasil.com.br> References: <443165D7.5040005@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20060404102525.GA1248@tin.it> <44327011.8040801@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20060404143452.GA2932@tin.it> <44328659.8010102@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:44:41AM -0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote: > Do you have any special points to make about the testing enviroment? I > am gonna run it in one prouction box and other testing only boxes, > should CFLAGS have -g to make any report if needed? -g is useful for kernel/core dump, but i hope we won't need that :) if you find anything wrong, contact me in private so we can sort it out. bye -- Paolo "le influenze esterne sono troppe, il mondo reale non e' mica quello fatato dei komunisti :-p" - Anonymous Lumbard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060404150120.GA3159>