From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 8 12: 8:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from viper.lovett.com (viper.lovett.com [216.60.121.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661AD14BF7 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 12:08:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by viper.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11kv4z-000Lqa-00; Mon, 08 Nov 1999 14:07:53 -0600 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 14:07:53 -0600 From: Ade Lovett To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KDE + Qt libraries + gcc 2.95 Message-ID: <19991108140753.B83804@lovett.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from jedgar@fxp.org on Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 02:49:27PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 02:49:27PM -0500, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > > My biggest concern will be the library incompatibility with kde libs > compiled with an older g++. Perhaps a version bump may alleviate > problems; otherwise, I don't expect the general populice will be too happy > with having to recomple *all* kde libs/apps. A version bump (in conjunction with setting USE_NEWGCC=YES) for all the KDE/Qt ports seems to be the best way to go in order to ensure consistency. Whilst it doesn't address the fact that people will have to do a fair chunk of recompiling, at least it will be obvious that they have to do so. -aDe [waiting for the day when the GNOME people decide they _have_ to use gcc-2.95.x ..] -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message