From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 10:29:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E5F16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:29:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.efacilitas.de (efacilitas.de [213.133.110.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F9843D53 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:29:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from hoppel.local (port-212-202-38-171.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.38.171]) by mail.efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913931239B7 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:27:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221376142 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:31:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from hoppel.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.efacilitas.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42110-06 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:31:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F326147 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:31:51 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEvDtm5pZw==?= To: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:33:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcTGR4KQy0ip3hI9RhOIgZJKV7Emnw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: <20041109103151.40F326147@hoppel.local> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alpha-tierchen.de Subject: Re: standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:29:05 -0000 Rob wrote: > [...] > both have >=20 > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5 >=20 > although the first one claims to download CURRENT. >=20 > And, eh, why is the filename "standard-supfile" and > why not the more obvious "current-supfile" ? It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT. That's the reason why = it should not be renamed. The standard-supfile contains the standard tag = of your release to keep it up to date. Maybe someone will change this = sentence in standard-supfile to 'This file contains all of the "CVSup = collections" that make up the FreeBSD-stable source tree.' soon. Bj=C3=B6rn