From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 23:37:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA2716A420 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:37:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8B543D48 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1KNbhHf049973; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:37:43 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1KNbhUk049968; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:37:43 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:37:42 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20060220233742.GA42513@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Giorgos Keramidas , current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20060220231530.GA38930@nagual.pp.ru> <20060220232435.GA38768@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060220232435.GA38768@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lots of calcru: runtime went backwards, never saw it before X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:37:47 -0000 On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:24:35AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-21 02:15, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > What I got with recent -current (below). What does it mean, what I > > supposed to do and why I never saw it before? > > > > Feb 21 01:14:19 pobrecita kernel: calcru: runtime went backwards from > > 42153 usec to 42152 usec for pid 613 (sshd) > > Feb 21 01:14:19 pobrecita kernel: u 2:28102/28101 s 1:14051/14050 i 0:0/1 ... > Can you test with the following /etc/defaults/rc.conf vars set to "HIGH"? > > keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ grep _cx /etc/defaults/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf > /etc/defaults/rc.conf:performance_cx_lowest="LOW" # Online CPU idle state > /etc/defaults/rc.conf:economy_cx_lowest="LOW" # Offline CPU idle state This is definitely not my case. It is desktop server without any power saving, moreover, I have only one CPU state, i.e. LOW == HIGH == C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% -- http://ache.pp.ru/