From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 7 00:07:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56FF6AF9 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 00:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (ip-2-1-0-2.r03.asbnva02.us.ce.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:0:5000::16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7A019C3 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 00:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonderland.m5p.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0707IYA016841 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 19:07:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: <52CB4536.8090808@m5p.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:07:18 -0500 From: George Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT for cairo 1.12 and 8.x survey References: <52CAD9CA.1020304@rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <52CAD9CA.1020304@rainbow-runner.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.100.0.3 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:07:23 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:07:25 -0000 On 01/06/14 11:28, Koop Mast wrote: > [...] > First off before the real CFT. We are interested if people are still > using 8.x for there desktop. Is there a specific reason for not updating > to 9.x or 10.x? [...] 10.x? Surely you are kidding. 9.x? Still haven't gotten a warm fuzzy feeling about the 9.x series. Every release, from 9.0 to 9.1 to 9.2, seems to have been forced out the door before it was really ready. As a result, I'm in the middle of updating my server from 8.3-STABLE to 8.4-STABLE. And as for X, some time last summer the combination of X + xdm + xfce4 stopped working in any release of FreeBSD. ("XDM authorization key matches an existing client!") -- George