From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:20:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76FB106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A898FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0CHKwNO088142; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:20:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0CHKw4k088141; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:20:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:20:57 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Alexander Best Message-ID: <20090112172057.GA78699@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Alexander Best , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch to fix burncd bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:20:59 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 06:13:14PM +0100, Alexander Best wrote: > could somebody please commit the following patch to dev/ata? it fixes a nasty > bug during fixation in burncd. the bug exists in RELENG6, RELENG7 and HEAD > (and maybe RELENG5): > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?prp=95979-3-txt&n=/patch I've committed the ata-queue.c change (r187105) as I hit this again over the weekend. I didn't commit the timeout change as I'm not sure all the implications. Also folks "thought" cdrecord did the same, but I didn't see a high enough confidence factor and I didn't have time to track it down myself. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"