From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 26 09:30:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA01271 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 09:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA01248 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 09:29:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA15019; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 10:20:59 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199603261720.KAA15019@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: -questions etiquette To: ANDRSN@HOOVER.STANFORD.EDU (Annelise Anderson) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 10:20:59 -0700 (MST) Cc: wes@intele.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <01I2RTI28U7600K419@HOOVER.STANFORD.EDU> from "Annelise Anderson" at Mar 25, 96 10:55:18 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I agree with both David and Wes here..... > > But I would like to say that I would rather have a rude answer than > no answer at all--I'd rather have someone say "You idiot, read ___" > than not get anything.... > > And I have posted a question recently that has not been answered at > all, about why pgp does not compile on 2.1. And I think not answering > is rude. > > Annelise I'll answer that one: I don't know, I don't use PGP; I think it's silly without a recognized key authority. That aside, I think that the newest version was reported to compile without changes; perhaps you should update your sources? It might get you running code, even if it doesn't make the port work. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.