From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jan 19 04:56:39 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id EAA19012 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 04:56:39 -0800
Received: from desiree.teleport.com (desiree.teleport.com [192.108.254.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA19006; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 04:56:37 -0800
From: bmk@dtr.com
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id EAA21750; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 04:56:19 -0800
Received: (from bmk@localhost) by dtr.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id EAA08752; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 04:57:38 -0800
Message-Id: <199501191257.EAA08752@dtr.com>
Subject: Re: Reboots under 2.0-SNAP pppd (once again).
To: fortin@zap.zap.qc.ca (Denis Fortin)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 04:57:38 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, bmk@dtr.com, questions@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199501190530.AAA09891@zap.zap.qc.ca> from "Denis Fortin" at Jan 19, 95 00:30:36 am
Reply-To: bmk@dtr.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 807       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> > > I just upgraded my system to the latest snapshot on wcarchive.  It seems
> > > now that some bugs may have crept back into the pppd code.
> > 
> > This is weird!  Why is nobody else reporting this?  I'll look into it
> > as best I can..

> I'm starting an upgrade of my home system to 2.0-950112-SNAP right now.
> I'll report on its relative stability with PPP tomorrow if all goes well.

> If all appears fine, I'll then upgrade our little gateway at work, which
> gateways between a pretty heavy PPP load + ethernet + 4 SLIP connections
> (and crashes twice daily with 2.0-RELEASE).

> I'll keep the list posted throughout this process if anything significant
> occurs.

I have disabled routed and haven't had any reboots since yesterday.

Were there significant changes done to the routing code?