From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 8 21:46:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C4E16A412; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from aa012msr.fastwebnet.it (aa012msr.fastwebnet.it [85.18.95.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AEC13C441; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from massimo@cedoc.mo.it) Received: from intanto (37.254.91.190) by aa012msr.fastwebnet.it (7.3.105.6) id 4556F291028EDC9F; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:46:18 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:46:18 +0100 From: Massimo Lusetti To: Jeff Roberson Message-Id: <20070108224618.495d6190.massimo@cedoc.mo.it> In-Reply-To: <20070108100720.J729@10.0.0.1> References: <20070104005625.D1508@10.0.0.1> <200701061935.31324.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20070106033749.V586@10.0.0.1> <200701061958.06484.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20070106041435.P586@10.0.0.1> <20070107171408.1792ad79.massimo@cedoc.mo.it> <20070108100720.J729@10.0.0.1> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kip Macy , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, David Xu , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:46:34 -0000 On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:09:23 -0800 (PST) Jeff Roberson wrote: > Thanks, I am working on some changes to improve SMP load balancing. I'm > going to test them more thoroughly on an array of machines that I have > here before I commit them, but I'll let you know when I do. Great, btw thanks to you an anyone involved with making FreeBSD a better OS! > In the future, it's more useful to do performance comparisons without > WITNESS or INVARIANTS enabled as these options may unfairly hinder one > scheduler or the other. However, I don't doubt the relative results you > present. When you commit the improvements I'll repeat the tests and will include even SCHED_CORE, if David haven't pull out from the tree. And i would like to also test PostgreSQL and if you or anyother has some hints i will take them all. Regards -- Massimo.run(); You just wait, I'll sin till I blow up! -- Dylan Thomas