Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:56:22 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ! why? [original emails enclosed: last post hopefully] Message-ID: <87d6703dll.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20040325140009.X73389-100000@cowpie.acm.vt.edu> (clint@acm.vt.edu's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:20:10 -0500 (EST)") References: <20040325140009.X73389-100000@cowpie.acm.vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-03-25T19:20:10Z, __Clint__ <clint@acm.vt.edu> writes: > I still don't believe for a second that this is due to me posting on any > public mail list. FreeBSD's mail servers and/or lists of email addresses > were somehow comprimised. The light is on, but nobody's home. Listen, Clint, it's as simple as this: you filed a bug report. That bug report is available online to whomever wishes to look at it. All bug reports are also forwarded to appropriate mailing lists so that the responsible parties can discuss them. These mailing lists are archived and searchable online. Search for "clint+freebsddotorg@acm.vt.edu" in Google Groups to see for yourself. We have explained this to you time and again, but you don't seem to hear it so I'm going to shout: NO SERVERS OR LISTS WERE COMPROMISED. YOU POSTED TO A PUBLIC FORUM. THIS IS YOUR MISUNDERSTANDING. I'm done explaining. Choose to listen or not - it's your call. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAYzlm5sRg+Y0CpvERAjknAJ0bePLmAkM/b5Wp0YlY3vUmSn1MFQCgmwie 39ejv2LnMcCQ7pEucmSRoqU= =kutb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87d6703dll.fsf>