Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:03:58 -0800 From: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@vlakno.cz> Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>, Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com>, FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: clang 3.9.0 buildkernel on old powerpc64's vs. trying to build hwpmc_e500.o and the like. . . Message-ID: <E49F7EE4-7A62-4601-98DC-4C4791B7158D@dsl-only.net> In-Reply-To: <20161208185541.GA33364@vlakno.cz> References: <300CB7A2-34BB-407F-B2E9-D263B119A989@dsl-only.net> <20161205161904.GA7889@vlakno.cz> <126E2EDE-9499-4103-A3DB-CC517105DAB2@dsl-only.net> <D3DE2D12-9885-4154-B680-6DA5A8B62A56@dsl-only.net> <D9C54972-8D21-4D55-A707-4FFC2BDCD9FE@dsl-only.net> <20161207190057.GA58950@vlakno.cz> <E1376C20-C1BD-418D-81C6-CDDE479342CA@dsl-only.net> <CE88C1F4-B9BD-4D45-8DF0-F1079C3257A5@dsl-only.net> <20161208185541.GA33364@vlakno.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[I have dropped the patch related information and just have
failing-boot related information here.]
On 2016-Dec-8, at 10:55 AM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky at vlakno.cz> wrote:
> Can you try to investigate why it dies? I am not convinced =
-mminimal-toc
> would result in a boot failure. I think the kernel would fail to link.
I give information for both devel/powerpc64-binutils based
and for WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP=3D based. They are different.
For using 2.25.1 of devel/powerpc64-binutils (a cross build):
(from camera image of screen)
. . . (omitted material) . . .
Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK unload
OK boot ker390
/boot/ker390/kernel data=3D0xf851a8+0x42dd98 =
syms=3D[0x8+0xd6848+0x8+0xf1137]
/boot/entropy size=3D0x1000
Booting. . .
Kernel entry at 0x100160
Invalid memory access at %SSR0: 00000000.001001b0 =
%SRR1:90000000.00003030
Apple PowerMac11,2 5.2.7f1 BootROM builtin on 09/30/005 at 15:31:03
. . . (omitted material) . . .
ok
0 >
The only options at this point are:
mac-boot
shut-down
=46rom objdump for the above failing boot
but with notes added:
(Note: booting xtoolchain kernel starts at
0000000000100120 instead; relative
offsets are unchanged and the code
is mostly the same.)
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000100160 <.__start> mfmsr r20
0000000000100164 <.__start+0x4> li r21,1
0000000000100168 <.__start+0x8> rldimi r20,r21,63,0
000000000010016c <.__start+0xc> mtmsrd r20
0000000000100170 <.__start+0x10> isync
0000000000100174 <.__start+0x14> nop
0000000000100178 <.__start+0x18> b 0000000000100180 =
<.__start+0x20>
000000000010017c <.__start+0x1c> nop
0000000000100180 <.__start+0x20> nop
0000000000100184 <.__start+0x24> bl 0000000000100190 =
<.__start+0x30>
0000000000100188 <.__start+0x28> .long 0x0
000000000010018c <.__start+0x2c> .long 0xf8ce78 =20
booting xtoolchain based kernel has: 0xfebeb8 above <<<=3D=3D=3D =
note
0000000000100190 <.__start+0x30> mflr r2
0000000000100194 <.__start+0x34> ld r1,0(r2)
0000000000100198 <.__start+0x38> add r2,r1,r2
000000000010019c <.__start+0x3c> ld r31,-32768(r2)
00000000001001a0 <.__start+0x40> subf r31,r31,r2
00000000001001a4 <.__start+0x44> ld r1,0(r2) <<<=3D=3D=3D =
!!!!!
booting xtoolchain based kernel has: r1,-32760(r2) above <<<=3D=3D=3D =
!!!!!
00000000001001a8 <.__start+0x48> addi r1,r1,16288
00000000001001ac <.__start+0x4c> add r1,r1,r31
00000000001001b0 <.__start+0x50> std r3,48(r1)
SRR0 points at the above instruction
(I stopped comparing to the booting xtoolchain
based code after this.)
00000000001001b4 <.__start+0x54> std r4,56(r1)
00000000001001b8 <.__start+0x58> std r5,64(r1)
00000000001001bc <.__start+0x5c> std r6,72(r1)
00000000001001c0 <.__start+0x60> bl 00000000001001cc =
<.__start+0x6c>
00000000001001c4 <.__start+0x64> .long 0x0
00000000001001c8 <.__start+0x68> .long 0xf84ed4
00000000001001cc <.__start+0x6c> mflr r3
00000000001001d0 <.__start+0x70> ld r4,0(r3)
00000000001001d4 <.__start+0x74> add r3,r4,r3
00000000001001d8 <.__start+0x78> mr r4,r31
00000000001001dc <.__start+0x7c> bl 0000000000b18ebc =
<.elf_reloc_self>
00000000001001e0 <.__start+0x80> nop
00000000001001e4 <.__start+0x84> ld r3,48(r1)
00000000001001e8 <.__start+0x88> ld r4,56(r1)
00000000001001ec <.__start+0x8c> ld r5,64(r1)
00000000001001f0 <.__start+0x90> ld r6,72(r1)
00000000001001f4 <.__start+0x94> mr r4,r2
00000000001001f8 <.__start+0x98> bl 0000000000b1e980 =
<.powerpc_init>
00000000001001fc <.__start+0x9c> nop
0000000000100200 <.__start+0xa0> mr r1,r3
0000000000100204 <.__start+0xa4> li r3,0
0000000000100208 <.__start+0xa8> std r3,0(r1)
000000000010020c <.__start+0xac> bl 00000000005c4af8 <.mi_startup>
0000000000100210 <.__start+0xb0> nop
0000000000100214 <.__start+0xb4> b 0000000000100214 =
<.__start+0xb4>
For using WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP=3D based binutils (a cross build):
(completes for buildkernel; fails for buildworld)
. . . (omitted material) . . .
Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK unload
OK boot ker39a
/boot/ker39a/kernel data=3D0xfd6318+0x42dda8 =
syms=3D[0x8+0xd6860+0x8+0xf1193]
/boot/entropy size=3D0x1000
Booting. . .
Kernel entry at 0x100160
Invalid memory access at %SSR0: 00000000.00000000 =
%SRR1:10000000.00081000
Apple PowerMac11,2 5.2.7f1 BootROM builtin on 09/30/005 at 15:31:03
. . . (omitted material) . . .
ok
0 >
The only options at this point are:
mac-boot
shut-down
The problem here is a different code order and a matching
wrong start address that does not track the difference.
(=46rom objdump.) Note: the same 0(r2) vs. -32760(r2) oddity
exists in the start routine as well.
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000100160 <.__start-0x2030> std r2,40(r1)
0000000000100164 <.__start-0x202c> addis r2,r2,1
0000000000100168 <.__start-0x2028> addi r2,r2,-8
000000000010016c <.__start-0x2024> b 0000000000b2c8e0 =
<.cpu_switch>
0000000000100170 <.__start-0x2020> std r2,40(r1)
0000000000100174 <.__start-0x201c> addis r2,r2,1
0000000000100178 <.__start-0x2018> addi r2,r2,-8
000000000010017c <.__start-0x2014> b 0000000000ade6c8 =
<.sf_buf_alloc>
0000000000100180 <.__start-0x2010> std r2,40(r1)
0000000000100184 <.__start-0x200c> addis r2,r2,1
0000000000100188 <.__start-0x2008> addi r2,r2,-8
000000000010018c <.__start-0x2004> b 0000000000a83f78 =
<.vm_fault_hold>
0000000000100190 <.__start-0x2000> std r2,40(r1)
0000000000100194 <.__start-0x1ffc> addis r2,r2,1
0000000000100198 <.__start-0x1ff8> addi r2,r2,-8
000000000010019c <.__start-0x1ff4> b 0000000000b1f1e8 =
<.fill_regs32>
00000000001001a0 <.__start-0x1ff0> std r2,40(r1)
00000000001001a4 <.__start-0x1fec> addis r2,r2,1
00000000001001a8 <.__start-0x1fe8> addi r2,r2,-8
00000000001001ac <.__start-0x1fe4> b 0000000000b1a7e4 =
<.casueword32>
00000000001001b0 <.__start-0x1fe0> std r2,40(r1)
00000000001001b4 <.__start-0x1fdc> addis r2,r2,1
00000000001001b8 <.__start-0x1fd8> addi r2,r2,-8
00000000001001bc <.__start-0x1fd4> b 0000000000a8fa30 =
<.kmap_free_wakeup>
. . .
0000000000102190 <.__start> mfmsr r20
0000000000102194 <.__start+0x4> li r21,1
0000000000102198 <.__start+0x8> rldimi r20,r21,63,0
000000000010219c <.__start+0xc> mtmsrd r20
00000000001021a0 <.__start+0x10> isync
00000000001021a4 <.__start+0x14> nop
00000000001021a8 <.__start+0x18> b 00000000001021b0 =
<.__start+0x20>
00000000001021ac <.__start+0x1c> nop
00000000001021b0 <.__start+0x20> nop
00000000001021b4 <.__start+0x24> bl 00000000001021c0 =
<.__start+0x30>
00000000001021b8 <.__start+0x28> .long 0x0
00000000001021bc <.__start+0x2c> .long 0xfc8e48
00000000001021c0 <.__start+0x30> mflr r2
00000000001021c4 <.__start+0x34> ld r1,0(r2)
00000000001021c8 <.__start+0x38> add r2,r1,r2
00000000001021cc <.__start+0x3c> ld r31,-32768(r2)
00000000001021d0 <.__start+0x40> subf r31,r31,r2
00000000001021d4 <.__start+0x44> ld r1,0(r2) <<< same 0 vs. =
-32760 oddity!!!
00000000001021d8 <.__start+0x48> addi r1,r1,16288
00000000001021dc <.__start+0x4c> add r1,r1,r31
00000000001021e0 <.__start+0x50> std r3,48(r1)
00000000001021e4 <.__start+0x54> std r4,56(r1)
00000000001021e8 <.__start+0x58> std r5,64(r1)
00000000001021ec <.__start+0x5c> std r6,72(r1)
00000000001021f0 <.__start+0x60> bl 00000000001021fc =
<.__start+0x6c>
00000000001021f4 <.__start+0x64> .long 0x0
00000000001021f8 <.__start+0x68> .long 0xfd4014
00000000001021fc <.__start+0x6c> mflr r3
0000000000102200 <.__start+0x70> ld r4,0(r3)
0000000000102204 <.__start+0x74> add r3,r4,r3
0000000000102208 <.__start+0x78> mr r4,r31
000000000010220c <.__start+0x7c> bl 0000000000101a20 <begin+0x1a20>
0000000000102210 <.__start+0x80> ld r2,40(r1)
0000000000102214 <.__start+0x84> ld r3,48(r1)
0000000000102218 <.__start+0x88> ld r4,56(r1)
000000000010221c <.__start+0x8c> ld r5,64(r1)
0000000000102220 <.__start+0x90> ld r6,72(r1)
0000000000102224 <.__start+0x94> mr r4,r2
0000000000102228 <.__start+0x98> bl 00000000001019a0 <begin+0x19a0>
000000000010222c <.__start+0x9c> ld r2,40(r1)
0000000000102230 <.__start+0xa0> mr r1,r3
0000000000102234 <.__start+0xa4> li r3,0
0000000000102238 <.__start+0xa8> std r3,0(r1)
000000000010223c <.__start+0xac> bl 00000000005c6b28 <.mi_startup>
0000000000102240 <.__start+0xb0> nop
0000000000102244 <.__start+0xb4> b 0000000000102244 =
<.__start+0xb4>
Who is most appropriate to send such information to for powerpc64?
=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E49F7EE4-7A62-4601-98DC-4C4791B7158D>