From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Mar 19 19:34:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from earth.hub.org (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1037B417 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:34:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40266103412; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:34:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from earth.hub.org (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11]) by earth.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158F31036AF; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:34:15 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:34:14 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Terry Lambert Cc: Kenneth Culver , Steve Wingate , Subject: Re: Intel Xeon hyperthreading In-Reply-To: <3C9118D6.81B9FD62@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20020319233305.T12196-100000@mail1.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > So the answer is really a question... does the original poster > have their patches to GCC ready so that we can compile code > that tests hyperthreading? My question to your question ... does anyone know if the GCC group is working on such a patch/optimization? From your response, it sounds more like a compiler issue right now then an OS one ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message