Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:06:50 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Poudriere friendly armv7 relases Message-ID: <CANCZdfo7A6%2BzB%2B=Wx5Y9VYFCsSk=Aa%2B9657FxfG0whM-Wsx1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000564a8205f75a7845 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Greetings, Since it looks like we're going to retain at least armv7 for FreeBSD 14 (armv6 has been nominated for deprecation, but if it isn't deprecated, all this applies to it). I'd like to start making at least the base.tgz, etc available for armv7. This would allow us to create armv7 poduriere jails without building from source. Is there some reason we're not doing this today? I know ISOs don't make a lot of sense in the arm ecosystem, but having these artifacts would enable poudriere binary install support. Comments? Warner --000000000000564a8205f75a7845 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Greetings,<div><br></div><div>Since it looks like we'r= e going to retain at least armv7 for FreeBSD 14 (armv6 has been nominated f= or deprecation, but if it isn't deprecated, all this applies to it).</d= iv><div><br></div><div>I'd like to start making at least the base.tgz, = etc available for armv7. This would allow us to create armv7 poduriere jail= s without building from source.</div><div><br></div><div>Is there some reas= on we're not doing this today? I know ISOs don't make a lot of sens= e in the arm ecosystem, but having these artifacts would enable poudriere b= inary install support.</div><div><br></div><div>Comments?</div><div><br></d= iv><div>Warner</div><div><br></div></div> --000000000000564a8205f75a7845--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfo7A6%2BzB%2B=Wx5Y9VYFCsSk=Aa%2B9657FxfG0whM-Wsx1kQ>