From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Nov 24 12:47:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2F737B401 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:47:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3523D43E91 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:47:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18693; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:47:12 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE13ACF.4020706@owt.com> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 12:47:11 -0800 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Port INDEX dependency list incompletes References: <3DDF911D.5FF8F512@ene.asda.gr> <3DDF9EFC.E3B42B5D@ene.asda.gr> <20021123170312.3af58fdd.a@grunix.com> <3DDFA761.D459E000@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFCA8A.40104@owt.com> <3DDFE0AC.57BF260E@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFE4D6.5090901@owt.com> <1038154230.83586.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I trimmed the cc's on this one. Stacey Roberts wrote: > Hi Kent, > Thought you might be able to make more of this than I would. I jsut > looked that the output from my make index after today's cvsup of the > ports tree: > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk83 > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/textproc/expat2 > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/textproc/expat2 > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/lang/python > make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/lang/python > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: *** Error code 1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: *** Error code 1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: > Done. > # portsdb -u > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 3537 port > entries found /usr/ports/INDEX:1:Port info line must consist of 10 > fields. > /usr/ports/INDEX:2:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. > /usr/ports/INDEX:3:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. > /usr/ports/INDEX:4:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. > /usr/ports/INDEX:5:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. > /usr/ports/INDEX:6:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. > .........1000.........2000.........3000..... ..... done] > # > > > Seems that even "make index" and "portsdb -u" is failing as well. > Something happened to your setup. My mirror updates @ 4 hour increments beginning at 0200 and at 1230, which is 15 minutes ago, I didn't have any problems. ruby# make index Generating INDEX - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 Done. ruby# portsdb -u [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 7876 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000........ ..... done] I would update your ports-all again. I am assuming that what ever broke yours was fixed when I ran mine. FWIW, there is a proposed patch to the port Makefile that gets rid of the freeciv-imlib message. When you use it, you see ruby# make index Generating INDEX - please wait.. Done. ruby# portsdb -u [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 7877 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000........ ..... done] Since you no longer have the bogus duplicate, the number of ports has increased by 1. If you aren't using freeciv, you probably don't have a problem and implementing the patch can be a pain because of imbedded ^A's. The Makefile will probably be fixed in a couple of days. Kent > > > On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 20:28, Kent Stewart wrote: > >>Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote: >> >>>Kent Stewart wrote: >>> >>> >>>>cd /usr/ports >>>>make index >>>>portsdb -u >>> >>> >>>I get almost always "dependency list incompletes" with portsdb -Uu. >>>Would it be a good idea to always use the above instead? >> >>No, because portsdb -U uses much less computer time to rebuild INDEX >>than make index does. On my AMD 2000+ XP, which is designed to do 20 >>minute buildworlds, a portsdb -U requires ~7 minutes and a make index >>requires ~11 minutes. If you are going to work on your ports, the >>extra time is time you just sit there. I find people go into their own >>version of an idle-loop after 2 minutes. >> >>We just have to wait for knu to fix it. >> >>KEnt > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message