Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:10:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael K. Smith" <mksmith@noanet.net> To: <lists@3bags.com> Cc: <mksmith@noanet.net>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: arplookup messages? now what have I done? Message-ID: <12511.128.107.253.37.1044565811.squirrel@noc.noanet.net> In-Reply-To: <002a01c2ce23$6dc61330$aeb423cf@3bagsmedia> References: <21572.128.107.253.37.1044564793.squirrel@noc.noanet.net> <002a01c2ce23$6dc61330$aeb423cf@3bagsmedia>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mailing list said: > > Hmmm, I'm confused > >> If you want to have your aliases attached to the tl0 >> interface, you need to use addresses in that range. So, >> something like: >> >> ifconfig_tl0_alias3="inet XXX.82.15.210 netmask 0xffffffff" > > That's what I have, and I'm getting those funny arplookup error > messages. > Nope, in your original message, you had the other subnet attached to the tl0 interface. Also, you had a 255.255.255.0 subnet attached to the de0 interface if I recall correctly. > I have two DSL lines, one provides the 82.15.209+ and the other the > 167.176.x, but both have the same 255.255.255.240 subnet. I'm thinking > that this may have something to do with the messages? > Send another snippet of your rc.conf file as it relates to these interfaces. I seem to recall that your aliases and interface on the de0 side were in different subnets to start. Plus, all of your aliases were using IP's from the de0 subnet (with the wrong mask, mind you) but were attached to the tl0 interface. Mike -- Michael K. Smith Senior Network and Systems Engineer - NoaNet mksmith@noanet.net 206.219.7116 NOC: 866.662.6380 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12511.128.107.253.37.1044565811.squirrel>