From owner-freebsd-security Tue Oct 3 9:11:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC9937B502; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27858; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:11:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA23351; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:11:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:11:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010031611.KAA23351@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Silbersack Cc: Nate Williams , Jordan Hubbard , Alfred Perlstein , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf In-Reply-To: References: <200010030426.WAA21046@nomad.yogotech.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > Can we please loose everything but telnet and ftp? This getting > > > > > > That wouldn't bother me at all. > > > > I think the 'internal' auth should be on as well, since sendmail (for > > silly reasons) likes it on, and the internal version is silly enough to > > keep sendmail happy. > > > > > > Nate > > Isn't sendmail just as happy getting a RST back when it tries to > connect? Yep, but it slows mail transfers down quite a bit. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message