From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Aug  7 09:53:07 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA17391
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA17375;
          Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA07096; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 18:50:46 +0200 (MET DST)
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
cc: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm), nate@mt.sri.com,
        current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Whither gcc 2.7? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Aug 1996 09:01:34 PDT."
             <199608071601.JAA05628@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> 
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 18:50:46 +0200
Message-ID: <7094.839436646@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199608071601.JAA05628@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" write
s:
>Remeber, what goes into src/contrib should be the _complete_ sources, with
>_no_ changes at all, otherwise we might as well go back to what we have
>been doing.

no.  I disagree here.  It is legal and required to remove stuff that 
qualifies as "bloat".

The gcc support for any cpu but i386 qualifies for that.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.