Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:06:36 +0100
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r412296 - head/lang/rust
Message-ID:  <E207BCC9DD7103BC81BCD8B8@ogg.in.absolight.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU734xGcOuzH%2BbSNMZw6M8a5GYZkdSD11L8-h_T9W2zge18jg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201603312004.u2VK4n5n028013@repo.freebsd.org> <CAFU734wN13GQnHuXHQ_sW97v9%2Bq3TSYyZPHiqLTjq5HYwO=SAQ@mail.gmail.com> <C4C464C799DD4405CCC76990@atuin.in.mat.cc> <CAFU734xGcOuzH%2BbSNMZw6M8a5GYZkdSD11L8-h_T9W2zge18jg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========E1EE4548784C4FD58985==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

+--On 1 avril 2016 12:05:47 +0200 Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org> wrote:
| On 1 April 2016 at 11:45, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote:
| 
|> It is documented in the porter's handbook, where it all belongs:
|> <https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintain
|> er.html>
|> 
|> And, it is covered by the "Trivial and tested build and runtime fixes."
|> bullet point.
| 
| Thanks for stepping in, but I am a 100% sure that this statement will
| not put the case to rest. Based on this statement:
| - John will maintain his position that this commit was trivial, tested
| and fixes a problem *on DragonFly* and hence *is* covered by the
| blanket
| - I will maintain my position that this commit does *not* fix a
| problem *on FreeBSD* and hence is *not* covered by the blanket
| 
| I am totally fine accepting any verdict from portmgr, but I want it to
| be inescapably clear. Please review the commit and let us know once
| and for all: Is this particular one covered by the blanket or not?

*I* would say that you are right and it's not a FreeBSD fix, and thus, is
not covered by the blanket.  But I don't know what portmgr as a whole
thinks about it.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
--==========E1EE4548784C4FD58985==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=u9p5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==========E1EE4548784C4FD58985==========--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E207BCC9DD7103BC81BCD8B8>