From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 22:31:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA89D9B13D8 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org) Received: from olinguito.schwarzes.net (olinguito.schwarzes.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:1b5::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3BB19C4 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:31:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org) Received: from [62.109.78.35] (mosquito.schwarzes.net [62.109.78.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by olinguito.schwarzes.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id t72MVmV4027901 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:31:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org) From: Andreas Schwarz To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Mail-Reply-To: Andreas Schwarz Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:31:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46b2774496a.7c2d3e1a@mail.schwarzes.net> In-Reply-To: <46ae842c213.4a570874@mail.schwarzes.net> References: <55A7D8CE.4020809@selasky.org> <55B23276.8090703@selasky.org> <55B73113.2020308@selasky.org> <55B8AB76.7030603@selasky.org> <55B8B297.1010008@selasky.org> <20150729154516.GH78154@funkthat.com> <55B8F5EC.2050908@selasky.org> <46ae842c213.4a570874@mail.schwarzes.net> User-Agent: YAM/2.9p1 (MorphOS; PPC; rv:20140418r7798) Subject: Re: DWC OTG TX path optimisation for 11-current MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (olinguito.schwarzes.net [78.47.41.143]); Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:31:49 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 22:31:52 -0000 On 31.07.15, Andreas Schwarz wrote: > On 30.07.15, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: >> Yes, it did. I can't say from which revision it's happening. I try to >> keep kernel updated with each change related to this problem, as I >> hope that it helps. But the problem is still present. >> >> However, the kernels were built without INVARIANTS. Yesterday, I >> prepared some debug patch which needed INVARIANTS anf KTR options and >> the problem did not happen. The buildworld finished in about 15 hours >> (taken from uptime) so it was about 2 hours faster then with kernel >> before r285935. > > This could be important, my kernel config is also without INVARIANTS. During the weekend I made some tests, the problem is also reproducable with the standard RPI2 kernel config. Maybe not so often (but this is just a feeling). -asc