From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 12 20:21:10 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA52D16A418;
	Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:21:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC92743D45;
	Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:21:08 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5])
	by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5CKL3Wm061811;
	Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:21:03 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:20:42 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <optax2g7jq4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net>
	<opta09vodb17d6mn@nuclight.avtf.net>
	<20060612185751.GB1226@roadrunner.aventurien.local>
In-Reply-To: <20060612185751.GB1226@roadrunner.aventurien.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200606121620.44136.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1534/Mon Jun 12 08:30:53 2006 on
	anuket.mj.niksun.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ng_tag - new netgraph node,
	please test (L7 filtering possibility)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:21:10 -0000

On Monday 12 June 2006 02:57 pm, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> > I hope that my explanation was helpful enough to understand :)
> > Also, if you will be using 7.0, include BPF_JITTER in your kernel
> > config as this will enable native code-compiling for bpf and
> > ng_bpf - this will speed things up.
>
> Am I the only one, that thinks BPF_JITTER is a stupid name? It
> suggest you add or enable jitter for the packet flow. No one wants
> jitter! It sucks. Why isn't it called simply BPF_JIT? Everyone
> knows what JIT stands for, JITTER on the other hand is to be
> avoided.

I am the guilty one and I hate the name myself. :-)  This feature was 
imported from WinPcap:

http://www.winpcap.org/docs/docs31/html/group__NPF__code.html#ga33

I didn't want another name for the same thing.

Jung-uk Kim