From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jan 19 10:25:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C781337B404; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:25:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA07568; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:25:12 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010119111143.049ff8a0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:25:03 -0700 To: Terry Lambert , rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in (Rahul Siddharthan) From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Why did NetBSD and FreeBSD diverge? Cc: reg@FreeBSD.ORG (Jeremy Lea), kris@catonic.net (Kris Kirby), freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200101191752.KAA10973@usr08.primenet.com> References: <20010119120655.N11626@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:52 AM 1/19/2001, Terry Lambert wrote: >Think "blanket party", as punishment for a members violation >of the rules established by the controlling membership. I haven't encountered the term "blanket party" since I read the book Don Quixote years ago. What is a good definition of it? (I'd assumed, from context, that it involved public humiliation and/or suppression of an individual.) And what rule (or rules) set by TPTB do you think I have violated? --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message