Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:06:51 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Direct or indirect libdependencies (using the libintl.so.8 case) Message-ID: <4C0E163B.1020305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100608113132.718328d8vm9jcrok@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <4C04CAAA.7080001@janh.de> <20100603123728.GA1605@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100603150208.19603v4b90d4jeec@webmail.leidinger.net> <4C09010A.7010906@janh.de> <20100605233947.00006cce@unknown> <4C0D03A1.3040100@FreeBSD.org> <20100608092305.135975l67lzv7ksg@webmail.leidinger.net> <4C0DF230.4010603@FreeBSD.org> <20100608113132.718328d8vm9jcrok@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger ha scritto: > Now the number of people which know about it is bigger. Time will tell > if the subset of people which do something about it is non-empty now... I think the first step could be to run a tinderbox build with a patched libtool and see if anything break. Then, if the patch is simple, we could add a target to patch ports using bundled libtool and see again if anything break on tinderbox. What do you think? -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0E163B.1020305>