From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 25 06:57:11 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913B16A421;
	Fri, 25 May 2007 06:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu)
Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu (mail.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.31])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEF213C4C7;
	Fri, 25 May 2007 06:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu)
Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818FC2C2A66;
	Fri, 25 May 2007 01:57:10 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-2.4.0 at mail.cs.rice.edu
Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1])
	by mail.cs.rice.edu (mail.cs.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with LMTP id AHvi+OXkzc14; Fri, 25 May 2007 01:57:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [216.63.78.18] (adsl-216-63-78-18.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net
	[216.63.78.18])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD6A2C2A65;
	Fri, 25 May 2007 01:57:02 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <465688BC.90308@cs.rice.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:57:00 -0500
From: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20070328
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: attilio@FreeBSD.org
References: <20070520155103.K632@10.0.0.1>
	<20070521113648.F86217@besplex.bde.org>
	<20070520213132.K632@10.0.0.1> <4651CAB8.8070007@FreeBSD.org>
	<4651CE2F.8080908@FreeBSD.org> <20070521022847.D679@10.0.0.1>
	<20070521195811.G56785@delplex.bde.org>
	<4651FCB5.7070604@FreeBSD.org>
	<20070521225032.C57233@delplex.bde.org>
	<20070522162819.N5249@besplex.bde.org>
	<20070522201336.C87981@besplex.bde.org>
	<46533CAD.8030104@FreeBSD.org> <4655C67A.9060000@FreeBSD.org>
	<46558E43.8040608@cs.rice.edu> <465612C4.3040400@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <465612C4.3040400@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: alc@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>,
	Bruce Evans <bde@optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: sched_lock && thread_lock()
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:57:11 -0000

Attilio Rao wrote:

>
> Ok, I've updated the patch following your suggestion.
> I just left out that vmmeter fields which needs to be incremented not 
> by one but by another value (since PCPU_LAZY_INC() just increments by 1).
>
> Do you think it is more appropriate to expand the PCPU_LAZY_*() 
> interface and let it cover increments not by 1 too?
>

Yes, but let's do that in a later patch, not this one.

Alan