From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 16 18:18:37 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985C316A400
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:18:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pertti.kosunen@pp.nic.fi)
Received: from pne-smtpout4-sn1.fre.skanova.net
	(pne-smtpout4-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.168])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4F443D49
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:18:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pertti.kosunen@pp.nic.fi)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (84.249.9.74) by
	pne-smtpout4-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.070)
	id 43CBBB290043B5F2; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:18:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4419ABF7.70707@pp.nic.fi>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:18:31 +0200
From: Pertti Kosunen <pertti.kosunen@pp.nic.fi>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <lists@wm-access.no>
References: <001101c64754$cbbd65d0$0201a8c0@oxy>
	<441986D5.8090208@wm-access.no>
In-Reply-To: <441986D5.8090208@wm-access.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, OxY <oxy@field.hu>
Subject: Re: problem with Marwell gigabit performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:18:37 -0000

Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> You might have a duplex mismatch problem.

Isn't there only full-duplex in 1000baseTX?