From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jun 27 14:30:28 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA03992 for current-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jun 1995 14:30:28 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA03953 ; Tue, 27 Jun 1995 14:30:04 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA05114; Tue, 27 Jun 1995 23:29:41 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA22045; Tue, 27 Jun 1995 23:29:32 +0200 Message-Id: <199506272129.XAA22045@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Garrett Wollman cc: Mark Murray , geoff@ufrmsa1.olivetti.za, gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More crypto proposals. Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 23:29:32 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > < said: > > > In the (distant) past, the US folks have made their own crypto libraries , > > and it has been up to _us_ to track _them_. If we are running a non-US > > crypto site, and we are not subject to US law in this regard, how would > > the US residents feel about us making the non-US code as _we_ > > like it? > > I don't think this is a problem, with the caveat that if anything is > to got out with the label ``FreeBSD'' on it, it should get the same > sort of review as anything else that is a part of the system. Wonderful! I was hoping you would say this! I did _not_ want my efforts to be seen as a gung-ho go-it-alone thing. I just want a legal, moral and acceptable method of getting some decent code into FreeBSD. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200