From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 20:51:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826C9BC5AAF for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D45613AC for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5C68FBC5AAC; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C13FBC5AAB for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E0E13A9; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x131so234096873ite.0; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:51:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AKMX3gFRaQRmjhWzMuTYmXONm9L4Uf/zQymeAKEYq0g=; b=V9pFeAwPfL6rFhW2INQ7c/iqxgyaNU0cSceTAN//Uq5AFP7oRo33rEBWh6JuZSL3OF ByD/2+yQ7HmOXH/kFAn0gqnJQG9INNSHvoxA+Cs/3ONbysjOo2o3virHf0/HQNAJgbiR lAFkHraib6DPdc6SHgt5dGnmoirjLYkw+Fp6v/vQt8hR92BOm0dJcvHHBx/hO0NOddpu rCzCchBWYLKMn5OqQKc8G6xcdCMKgjQ6h1C3YdvABSdGCmD7ZvsYzlJs7qGMztuE939b VwPmmCmboPm0yuCUQcQP0ABNxvJ9wNaAd2+9gc5EGxmTWTZPD3QkwVoOTYdtfyq5FbfX PRYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AKMX3gFRaQRmjhWzMuTYmXONm9L4Uf/zQymeAKEYq0g=; b=I6iz1di3sZHacjWThETMn2mvF1jvOt4w2rKPMveq4Xwka6CjkLs5GMMvbSY+kbmDQn l+bjU0rX/7OZ+m75LCBh4OXaeKu+2RGwYtRnn/yoJ7IwhBpdNoDWg4i9VL1Oi2oCAOFm EpZblhnL4cFX59wYPBqT09NF9+JJXQes+rklFO5ktxOO87d6g+/R9naq9lJLnVuNuiw0 sz9HlWiLkwlWGAhAVGQdZT5sn76iCOf8AhRekq3KCeIeHb/S6DM2IEKWimJ9v4G3vef3 m4kJ4o2KIs68DsUX3qlMjMEozrfrV5yuadKty1Ai2v9Uul41M0LFp4VMcdn7eBMoGduW XOYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPzG5AW1z2PRERx1+h0KobMDstG+QAt+BQyLVwk+TMjX1P/K9MyYsNE5hlpBYLerqE5PO+BkxP0ogG4pA== X-Received: by 10.107.144.10 with SMTP id s10mr6070247iod.165.1472071908474; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:51:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.141.129 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:51:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160824202338.GO19112@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160824190352.GK19112@FreeBSD.org> <20160824194557.GM19112@FreeBSD.org> <20160824201921.GN19112@FreeBSD.org> <20160824202338.GO19112@FreeBSD.org> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:51:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: iwn(4) association issues in 11-Stable (and maybe RC) To: Glen Barber Cc: Kevin Oberman , FreeBSD Net , Andriy Voskoboinyk , =?UTF-8?Q?Vin=C3=ADcius_Zavam?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:51:49 -0000 hi Would /someone/ pretty please fix this "run wpa_supplicant multiple times at interface start" problem? I'm sure it's screwing things up in a bad way, and trying to grovel around and fix the way we do rc scripts is not my favourite thing in the world. Thanks, -adrian On 24 August 2016 at 13:23, Glen Barber wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:19:21PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 01:11:21PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > On Aug 24, 2016 12:46 PM, "Glen Barber" wrote: >> > >> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:20:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Glen Barber wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:55:13AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > > > > > Not working right. I do see 802.11 messages but nothing from iwn. >> > > > > > Rebuilt with: >> > > > > > options IEEE80211_DEBUG >> > > > > > options IWN_DEBUG >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [...] >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Any idea what is going on? >> > > > > >> > > > > Your original email mentions 11.0-BETA4. Are you still running >> > > > > stable/11? If so, could you please update to r304715? If running >> > > > > releng/11.0, the matching commit is r304719. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > Since my initial post I have updated to r304734 (running 11-STABLE). I >> > > did >> > > > that before rebuilding my kernel with the DEBUG options as it was already >> > > > three weeks old. So this does not seem to have fixed the issue. >> > > >> > > Dumb question, but with reason. >> > > >> > > Does ifconfig(8) actually show wlan0 'UP'? >> > > >> > > I'm asking this because I'm seeing something strange locally on one >> > > machine. >> > > >> > >> > I have been unable to catch it, so I don't know. I know the UP/DOWN >> > sequences in the first log showed many per second and all in the same >> > second. In this case it was UP for 13 seconds, so something was different. >> > >> > I will try to test some more later, but I have to go out for a couple of >> > hours right now. >> > >> >> Ok, thanks. This is different than the issue I'm seeing, part of which >> turned out to be a config issue on one of two machines, but completely >> odd on the other. >> > > Sigh. On my side, it was a config issue on both machines. Sorry for > the noise, but I'm sure you understand my concern and panic this late in > 11.0. > > Glen >