From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 18 19:17:05 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A09C537B401; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.117.225.220])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 019F543F3F; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: from hub.org (unknown [64.117.225.220])
	by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 98D336BA8F2; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:16:58 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:16:58 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: "Tim J. Robbins" <tjr@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030619121430.A29274@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
Message-ID: <20030618231640.T8920@hub.org>
References: <20030618112226.GA42606@fling-wing.demos.su>
	<20030618121620.GG835@starjuice.net>
	<20030619121430.A29274@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/nullfs null.h null_subr.c null_vnops.c
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 02:17:05 -0000

On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Tim J. Robbins wrote:

> At least one of the sections is well-deserved: umapfs is horribly broken
> on -current, and only works by accident on previous releases. I'm
> actually considering putting an even stronger warning on that one. The
> others (null and union) aren't nearly as bad, and have been fixed
> significantly since the notice was put on the manpages.

what is umapfs?  I don't have a man page for that one on my 4.x box ... ?