From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:31:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ABC16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6720143D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 53870312F5; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:31:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:31:16 -0500 (EST) From: user To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: RE: preventing deadlocks in snapshot directories - unexplained X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:31:18 -0000 I'm sorry - I misspoke in my original post, and I don't think I made clear what it was I was witnessing. What I am saying is, I have snapshots that exist _two_ directories deep off of the mount point, such as: /.snap/snap_directory1/snapshot /.snap/snap_directory2/snapshot and what I am seeing is, if I: cd /.snap (note, no snapshots in here) rm -rf snap_directory1/ (note, deleting a dir containing snapshot) What happens is, other operations inside of /.snap lock up. Which is contradictory to what I expected, and to what you have explained thus far in response to my original post (many thanks for those responses). Both you and I seem to expect that operations would only be locked for the /.snap/snap_directory1/ directory. I am going to try to reproduce this ... The "solution" I proposed was : /.snap/snapshot /.snap2/snapshot /.snap3/snapshot Which isn't much different, but it prevents the existence of a non-snapshot directory that could accidently be put into use, or be a pwd, or otherwise statted while a snapshot is deleted, etc. Any thoughts / comments ?