From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Jul 10 16:32:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3DF37BC4C for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:32:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA30177; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:31:08 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:29:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Jeff Hartley Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysKonnect and Intel gig boards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Don't use the wx driven EEPRO-1000 from 4.0 (wait for the 4.1 release which will have some bug fixes). I can't speak about SysKonnect. The Tigon-II based NetGear cards have been peachy. On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Jeff Hartley wrote: > Anyone have any experience (good/bad/indifferent) with the Intel GigSX > boards, or the SysKonnect dual-port GigSX boards, under 4.0-RELEASE? I'm in > need of quad-gig boxes, and I'm reluctant to stick with 3COM, based on an > unsatisfactory failure rate in the past. Horror stories or blessings, > anyone? I did notice that SysKonnect seems to be friendlier with the > developer community than Intel (go figure). > > Thanks, > -Jeff Hartley > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message