From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 19 02:32:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7162D16A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 02:32:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 923AD43D5D for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 02:32:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO 172.16.0.1) (mikej@69.193.222.195 with login) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2005 02:32:46 -0000 Received: from 172.16.0.199 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej) by 172.16.0.1 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:32:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3134.172.16.0.199.1113877964.squirrel@172.16.0.1> In-Reply-To: <426460FA.9090900@freebsd.org> References: <20050419005106.GA8857@bloom.cse.buffalo.edu> <426460FA.9090900@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:32:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Colin Percival" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Ken Smith Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4-RC3 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 02:32:48 -0000 On Mon, April 18, 2005 9:38 pm, Colin Percival said: > Ken Smith wrote: > >> The FreeBSD Release Engineering Team is pleased to announce the >> availability of FreeBSD 5.4-RC3 [...] We encourage people to help with >> testing [...] > > I've been running 5.4-RC2 for the past week without problems (and -RC1 > for a week before that, and -BETA before that). Should I upgrade to -RC3? > I'm > not sure if it's worth burning another few hundred megabytes of ftp mirror > bandwidth. Great, But if there have been changes since the code that you are running i think you should.