From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 15:58:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B1410656AD for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 15:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleksandr@samoylyk.sumy.ua) Received: from mail.telesweet.net (news.telesweet.net [194.110.252.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8499C8FC19 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 15:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleksandr@samoylyk.sumy.ua) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.telesweet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F9EB826 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 18:58:48 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Telesweet Mail Virus Scanner X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44] Received: from [10.0.0.109] (pigeon-work.telesweet [10.0.0.109]) by mail.telesweet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A641007B for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 18:58:16 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4820801A.90504@samoylyk.sumy.ua> Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 18:58:18 +0300 From: Oleksandr Samoylyk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: net@freebsd.org References: <48207C8B.4020509@samoylyk.sumy.ua> In-Reply-To: <48207C8B.4020509@samoylyk.sumy.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Problems with netgraph X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 15:58:50 -0000 Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote: > Dear developers, > > Please read this thread: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017891.html > > I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, so netgraph should fly. > It seems to get bad after 500 sessions... > > In FreeBSD 6 - it's swi1: net - 100% CPU > In FreeBSD 7 - it's em0 taskq - 100% CPU > > After playing with it I can make guess that's a netgraph problem. > > Maybe it's a poor design in netgraph the way it handle its tables and > it's is probably not designed to add so many interfaces. > > Might be there something in the source code I can edit to improve the > table lookups or hash table or whatever netgraph use to store and > process the node information and do the ppp/gre work. > I can also offer a shell access to server in order to investigate the problem. -- Oleksandr Samoylyk OVS-RIPE