From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  5 21:48:41 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10301065859
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  5 Jun 2012 21:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com)
Received: from mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com
	[98.139.253.105])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4BF8FC14
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  5 Jun 2012 21:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231])
	by mrout2-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id
	q55LmVgl076552
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com;
	s=cobra; t=1338932912;
	bh=riQzqMJAAaQbcv7On33ssbIl9wMyDYFwlZJ7EzSa8+s=;
	h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:
	Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=JgLtQr8/RwVS6m8VSOw5Tc6Jb1MHj28B522cIovFO8fevW+i0hCCKmDTn9jEhgdYC
	Yck11Kbuhpye+Bv39uA1ug1cuPSOYHfWebIUq8gxpGR3Gkw4EpIqg2ZoB3RIu7hoOg
	mAUcjdDFmTK9L3AXyNzHrSvN6ddsKv2UQPHsLQCY=
From: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com>
To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <1338922510.10539.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com>
References: <1338922510.10539.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:13:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1338930799.10539.12.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Milter-Version: master.31+4-gbc07cd5+
X-CLX-ID: 932912000
Subject: Re: est man page
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:48:41 -0000

On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 11:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I note that x86/cpufreq/est.c has some tuneables and I have processors
> that seem to be not supported by est even though they appear to have
> Speedstep features:
> 


> p4tcc0: <CPU Frequency Thermal Control> on cpu0
> est1: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu1
> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 15
> device_attach: est1 attach returned 6
> 
*ACTUALLY* this was caused by the Dell r410 that I was using having its
Power Managment control set to "Advanced Power Management" and not "OS
Control".  After I set that, the acpi methods in est attached correctly.

Sean