From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 8 17:14:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9E16A420; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:14:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from haven.freebsd.dk (haven.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD3443D5F; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:14:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by haven.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A97BC66; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:14:24 +0000 (UTC) To: Andre Oppermann From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:23:24 +0200." <42F786FC.1090805@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:14:24 +0200 Message-ID: <42925.1123521264@phk.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: Michael Reifenberger , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Hifn driver in SMP (was Re: GELI - disk encryption GEOM class committed.) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:14:31 -0000 In message <42F786FC.1090805@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann writes: >What's the deal with HiFn? IMHO Cavium are way better and much more >performant. They seem very "customer oriented" and we're not a (big enough) customer to get them very oriented. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.