From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 6 12:10:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367A716A4D1 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:10:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E059343D58 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:10:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040906121026.SBKY2583.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:10:26 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "dick hoogendijk" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:10:26 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20040906103327.GA21151@nagual.st> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: RE: MBR problem with FreeBSD 5.3 beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 12:10:27 -0000 owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > On 06 Sep Pedro n/a wrote: >> In the first time I rebooted my computer, after I've finished the >> installation of this version, my motherboard started to beep and I >> didn't know what to do. After reseting the computer I realized that >> I could no longer "boot" my Windows. I did selected it from BootMng >> and it gave no response. Even though I tried to use FDISK /MBR to >> rewrite the MBR, all my effords were in vain and I couldn't start >> windows again. >> Recently I've reinstalled an old release version (trustworthy) but >> windows still unable to boot. Does anyone know anything that could >> be helpful? > > I experienced the same thing w/ beta-2 > Just *before* putting an image back I discovered that beta-2 had > *changed* the LBA setting of my harddrive to another value. > Putting this back (manualy forcing the bios into using LBA), my > windows came back on.. Pfftt.. > > Def not a nice thing of beta-2 ;-( I have the same problem with 5.3 beta-2. How about some details explaining how you reset the HD to LBA mode. This is a bug with 5.3 that needs to be reported back to the development team so it gets fixed by next weekly beta release.