From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 23 14:32:48 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56A9F26F54 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5172F82F94 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8EE2333C38; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:32:39 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Anton Shterenlikht Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: https slower than svn+ssh? References: <201802231245.w1NCjXM4037579@jail0199.vps.exonetric.net> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:32:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201802231245.w1NCjXM4037579@jail0199.vps.exonetric.net> (Anton Shterenlikht's message of "Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:45:33 GMT") Message-ID: <44a7vz4vzs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:32:48 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht writes: > SourceForge says: > > "Access over https will not perform as well as svn+ssh, > so it should only be used if access using svn+ssh is problematic" > > https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/svn/#readwrite-access-via-https > > I wonder if this applies only to SourceForge, > or is a known fact for any svn connection. The latter. If you read the subversion documentation, you will find a listing of the tradeoffs between the different access methods available.