From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 26 13:01:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA12425 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 26 May 1996 13:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cicerone.uunet.ca (root@cicerone.uunet.ca [142.77.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA12416 for ; Sun, 26 May 1996 13:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from why.whine.com ([205.150.249.1]) by mail.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <115672-24747>; Sun, 26 May 1996 16:00:46 -0400 Received: from why (andrew@why [205.150.249.1]) by why.whine.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA00761; Sun, 26 May 1996 16:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 16:00:38 -0400 From: Andrew Herdman X-Sender: andrew@why To: John Fieber cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm never sleeps... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 26 May 1996, John Fieber wrote: > I just `upgraded' from XFree86 3.1.2 to 3.1.2E. Now `idle' xterm > process sit chewing up cpu time. A couple xterms will keep the > load average around 1 on an otherwise completely idle system. > > I'm running the May 1st FreeBSD-2.2 snapshot. Has anyone else > noticed this? I have noticed that with the X312E release (Ma64 sever) that the load average runs very very high compared to the 3.1.2D. I never noticed what it was but xterms seem plausible as the load is small when the machine is not running an xterm. Andrew