From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 18 06:06:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA12052 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 06:06:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from megaweapon.zigg.com (tcgr1-40.dialup.alliance.net [207.74.43.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA12011; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 06:06:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@zigg.com) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by megaweapon.zigg.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA17813; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:06:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@megaweapon.zigg.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:06:13 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Behrens To: Satoshi Asami cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Jordan's challenge (imap-uw) In-Reply-To: <199802180603.WAA09183@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * what was breaking the current port. I won't comment about software > * maintainers changing file structures so radically and not even changing > * the tarball name except to say "Yeesh". > That has always been a problem with this port. If someone can take > care of housing a "known good" tarball (like Imagemagick and lynx), it > will be much easier for people to use. I could do that. I have some well-connected (four backbone connections) http space. Matt Behrens | "Separation of church and state is http://www.zigg.com/ | absolutely essential," they say. Chanop Script Coordinator | Why, then, do they make America's World-Wide FreeNet IRC Network | state religion atheism? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message