From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 2 14:29:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859C216A420 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:29:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB6943D45 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:29:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/ZEIST.DE) with ESMTP id k22ETEbF077174; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:29:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id k22ET9Vc077173; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:29:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:29:08 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Solon Luigi Lutz Message-ID: <20060302152908.B76786@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <164311833.20060301174622@pyro.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <164311833.20060301174622@pyro.de>; from solon@pyro.de on Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 05:46:22PM +0100 X-AntiVirus-modified: yes X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.2-1; AVE: 6.33.1.3; VDF: 6.33.1.45; host: newtrinity.zeist.de) Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X1140a Gigabit Driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:29:16 -0000 On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 05:46:22PM +0100, Solon Luigi Lutz wrote: > Hello freebsd-sparc64, > > is there any driver for a SUN X1140a 1000BaseSX ethernet adapter > available? Either in the normal distribution or as some beta code > out in the wild? > Not as far as I can tell. In principle these should be supported by gem(4). What needs to be done to make them actually work is: - figure out the register layout (apparently it differs somewhat from the PCI variants) and add an SBus front-end, - add support for the SERDES, - make some performance improvements like adding support for checksum offloading and converting the TX side to use bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg(9). Marius -- This mail was scanned by AntiVir Milter. This product is licensed for non-commercial use. See www.antivir.de for details.