Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:13:01 +0200 From: Jedrzej Kalinowski <kalinoj1@iem.pw.edu.pl> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net>, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Bridging and stp question Message-ID: <4A2114BD.2050809@iem.pw.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <4A1FBE3E.9080203@incunabulum.net> References: <4A1EE0F5.1070909@iem.pw.edu.pl> <a31046fc0905281328hfc5c3e4gf9378ab22e62ad94@mail.gmail.com> <4A1EF6FB.7080306@iem.pw.edu.pl> <4A1FBE3E.9080203@incunabulum.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Simpson pisze: > Jedrzej Kalinowski wrote: >> pluknet pisze: >> >>> 2009/5/28 Jedrzej Kalinowski <kalinoj1@iem.pw.edu.pl>: >>> >>>> Is there any way to configure the bridge to add stp protocol to any >>>> added (via ifconfig bridgeX addm ifX) member interface - so to change >>>> the default behaviour? Or specifying it explicitly is unavoidable? >>>> >>>> >>> Let me clarify some. Did I understand you correctly >>> that `ifconfig bridge0 addm ifX stp ifX` doesn't fit you needs? >>> >>> >> >> Well, it works fine. >> >> It just would be more comfortable for me to do just: >> ifconfig bridge0 addm ifX >> >> and have bridge0 configured to add stp proto to each member interface as >> a default action. >> >> It would allow me to configure spanning tree on specific bridge >> globally, with no need to do it for each member interface. >> > > Can't you just put this command in a qemu-ifup script? > If not, can you clarify why it does not work for you? > > thanks, > BMS > Yes, I can - I do it already. I was just wondering if it was possible to change default behavior, if not it is not an issue/bug with if_bridge. I can use it and it works just fine. It's just about convenience. Thanks -- Jędrzej Kalinowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A2114BD.2050809>