From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 19:05:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE94A16A403 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@mavhome.dp.ua) Received: from cmail.optima.ua (cmail.optima.ua [195.248.191.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5BC43D66 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mav@mavhome.dp.ua) X-Spam-Level: 64 [XX] (100%) BAYESIAN TRAINING: 100 Received: from [195.248.178.122] (account mav@alkar.net HELO [192.168.3.2]) by cmail.optima.ua (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.11) with ESMTPA id 18994293 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:04:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4581A058.60500@mavhome.dp.ua> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:04:56 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: MPPC compression implementations legal status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:05:25 -0000 Hi. Can anybody explain me for sure current license status of Microsoft Point-to-Point Compression (MPPC) Protocol? It is not implemented in FreeBSD for years and I think it would be good to change this. In RFC 2118 told that "Source and object licenses are available on a non-discriminatory basis from Stac Electronics". Does it means requirement to get license to use HIFN implementation of this protocol or also denies any other free implementation? How does it coexist with Microsoft's "ROYALTY FREE PROTOCOL LICENSE AGREEMENT", http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms818807.aspx. Doesn't this agreement allows free implementation of server side protocols for cooperation with Windows client systems? -- Alexander Motin